ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Mapping teachers' awareness of artificial intelligence in the changing education paradigm: insights from a mixed methods inquiry.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, which reflect the rapid advancements in technology, has led to their widespread use in various fields, including health, finance and education. The effective and efficient use of AI tools in education is closely related to teachers' awareness in this regard. The objective of this study is to comprehensively ex-amine the AI awareness status of teachers by employing a mixed-method approach. The present study is designed based on a triangulation design and is conducted with a sample of 260 teachers. The findings of the study demonstrate that teachers have a moderate level of AI awareness, and that this awareness improves through AI tool use, receiving training, following publications, and daily internet use. The qualitative findings of the study corroborate the quantitative findings in that they also demonstrate that teachers have limited awareness of conceptual perception, educational use, and positive-negative effects concerning AI tools. The findings further indicate that the majority of educators acknowledge the benefits of AI while also expressing concerns about its limitations, resulting in an ambivalent perception. The prevailing opinion among educators is that AI is not yet capable of replacing teachers due to its inability to replicate affective skills such as empathy and building rapport. However, it is also reported that the effectiveness of this phenomenon is contingent upon conscious utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.