ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2026
Endoscopic rubber band ligation, injection sclerotherapy, and sclerobanding for the treatment of internal hemorrhoids.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe clinical outcomes of endoscopic rubber band ligation (ERBL), injection sclerotherapy (IS), and endoscopic polidocanol sclerobanding (ESB) have not yet been well studied.
aimTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of ERBL, IS, and ESB for treating grade I-III internal hemorrhoids.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study was performed on 201 patients, who were grouped according to their endoscopic treatment (ERBL, IS, and ESB groups). Postoperative follow-ups were initially carried out at 1, 3, and 6 months, and then every 6 months, with the longest follow-up extending to 24 months. The study analyzed clinical efficacy, short-term and overall recurrence rates, and postoperative adverse events. Additionally, subgroup analysis was conducted based on the internal hemorrhoid grade (I or II-III).
resultsThe patient distribution across the ERBL, IS, and ESB groups was 70, 66, and 65, respectively. Both the ERBL and ESB groups demonstrated lower overall recurrence rates compared with the IS group (
conclusionThe three treatments evaluated (ERBL, IS, and ESB) provide durable clinical outcomes for grade I hemorrhoids, with no significant differences in postoperative adverse events. For grade II-III hemorrhoids, ESB possesses the dual advantages of lower recurrence rates and reduced postoperative pain compared with IS and ERBL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.