Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41693962›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Process and Outcome Evaluation of Integrating Primary Eye Care into Primary Healthcare: A Quasi-Experimental Study in Rural China.

Xiaodong Dong, Ziyin Zhao, Jin Xu, Xiaochen Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaodong DongSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9340-4749
Ziyin ZhaoSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9833-3504
Jin XuSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6364-0887
Xiaochen MaSchool of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8251-3373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Visual impairment is a critical issue in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where unmet eye care needs are significant. The WHO's 2019 World Report on Vision recommends integrating primary eye care (PEC) into primary healthcare (PHC). This study evaluates the integration of PEC into PHC within County-wide Tight Medical Alliances (CTMAs) in rural China. Methods: From 2021 to 2023, we implemented the Results: The Conclusions: The Eye CARE Model successfully increased eye care utilization and demonstrated the feasibility of integrating PEC into PHC in rural China, emphasizing the importance of contextual factors in LMICs.

Indexed as

contextprimary eye careprimary healthcareprocess and outcome evaluationquasi-experimental studyvertically integrated health system

Identifiers

PMID41693962
PMCPMC12904124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.