ArticleEarly childhood education journal2026
Let's Do Engineering: Engineers and Creative Practitioners Experiences of Co-creating Activities and Resources for 3-7 Year-Olds, and Teacher Evaluation of Resource Effectiveness.
Article in Early childhood education journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Let's do Engineering was a research and engagement project running for 2 years in Scotland, aimed at broadening perceptions of engineering in the early years (ages 3-7). Engineer role models and creative practitioners co-created educational resources which were tested across a variety of settings, including preschool and primary schools. Twenty engineer role models developed over thirty different activities, reaching in excess of 4000 children across Scotland. This article focuses on the impact of the project on the engineer role models, creative practitioners and educators using a mixed methods approach, with data from surveys, interviews and focus groups (n = 49). This study draws out best practices for fostering collaborations between science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professionals and creative practitioners (artists) as well as for designing engineering activities for early years audiences. Key evaluation findings were that teachers reported high pupil engagement and valued the diversity of engineering role models, but challenges were identified in linking the resources with child-led early years pedagogies, and the complexity and length of some activities and resources. We have gained knowledge on what educators of 3-7 year olds are looking for when searching for STEM learning materials, and have identified factors that help or hinder the use of learning resources in classrooms. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10643-025-01858-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.