Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41693930›Full record

ArticleEarly childhood education journal2026

Let's Do Engineering: Engineers and Creative Practitioners Experiences of Co-creating Activities and Resources for 3-7 Year-Olds, and Teacher Evaluation of Resource Effectiveness.

Helen Bridle, Rebecca Donnelly, Annie Padwick, Gnanathusharan Rajendran, Joe Shimwell, Carol Davenport

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Early childhood education journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Helen BridleInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9068-7624
Rebecca DonnellyInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Biophysics and Bioengineering, Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS UK.
Annie PadwickNUSTEM, Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Northumbria University at Newcastle, Newcastle, NE1 8ST UK.
Gnanathusharan RajendranDepartment of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS UK.
Joe ShimwellNUSTEM, Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Northumbria University at Newcastle, Newcastle, NE1 8ST UK.
Carol DavenportNUSTEM, Faculty of Engineering and Environment, Northumbria University at Newcastle, Newcastle, NE1 8ST UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Let's do Engineering was a research and engagement project running for 2 years in Scotland, aimed at broadening perceptions of engineering in the early years (ages 3-7). Engineer role models and creative practitioners co-created educational resources which were tested across a variety of settings, including preschool and primary schools. Twenty engineer role models developed over thirty different activities, reaching in excess of 4000 children across Scotland. This article focuses on the impact of the project on the engineer role models, creative practitioners and educators using a mixed methods approach, with data from surveys, interviews and focus groups (n = 49). This study draws out best practices for fostering collaborations between science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professionals and creative practitioners (artists) as well as for designing engineering activities for early years audiences. Key evaluation findings were that teachers reported high pupil engagement and valued the diversity of engineering role models, but challenges were identified in linking the resources with child-led early years pedagogies, and the complexity and length of some activities and resources. We have gained knowledge on what educators of 3-7 year olds are looking for when searching for STEM learning materials, and have identified factors that help or hinder the use of learning resources in classrooms. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10643-025-01858-2.

Indexed as

Curriculum evaluationEarly yearsEngineeringSTEMTeacher perspectives

Identifiers

PMID41693930
PMCPMC12904914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.