ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Blood flow analysis of retinal neovascularisations in a VLDLR mouse model using contrast-enhanced optical coherence tomography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a major cause of global blindness that affects millions worldwide. Certain forms of AMD cause neovascularisations (NVs), which form retinal-choroidal anastomoses. This disrupts healthy haemodynamic patterns, and early detection and treatment are crucial for preserving vision. Here, we employ a custom-built optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging system to investigate these NVs in a very low-density lipoprotein receptor (VLDLR) knockout mouse model. Mice were imaged before, during, and after contrast agent injection, aiming to enhance our understanding of the NV haemodynamics. Doppler signal analysis techniques were employed to calculate flow velocities within individual NVs. Flow rates pre- and post-injection were determined based on these velocity measurements. Particle tracking was performed on two NVs for a comparative analysis with the Doppler velocity measurements. Both methods of measuring flow velocities showed good agreement post-contrast injection. The analysis of post-injection flow rates from the NVs revealed diverse behaviours. Some NVs exhibited stable flow rates over time, while others showed signs of instability, with flow rates changing substantially or even changing flow direction at different time points. Additionally, it was observed at multiple time points that flow from certain NVs moved from the choroid to the retina at the same time that other NVs displayed flow in the opposite direction. These observations suggest complex interactions between choroidal and retinal vascular networks in diseases like AMD. Further characterisation using contrast-enhanced Doppler OCT may improve our understanding of neovascular haemodynamics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.