ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Refractive adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope with fast 2D MEMS scanner.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reflective broadband adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope with 20 D focus range.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Automated montaging and contrast stretching of adaptive optics ophthalmoscope images.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Two-lens telecentric model eyes for image distortion measurement in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopes.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Automated animal gimbal steering for retinal imaging and stimulation.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We describe a refractive adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope designed for small animal imaging through a 1.8 mm diameter pupil. The optical setup, based on a search of achromatic doublets through multiple lens catalogs, consists of a sequence of modified afocal relays that deliver diffraction-limited imaging in pupil and retina conjugates. Real ray tracing is used to compare imaging performance when correcting large focus errors using a pupil conjugate wavefront corrector, a traditional Badal optometer, and a modified Badal optometer. Polarization control, focal length selection, and systematic lens tilting are explored for mitigating reflections with minimal imaging performance degradation. A 2-dimensional optical scanner with a 29.2 kHz resonant frequency around one axis and low dynamic surface distortion allows doubling the frame rate of prior instruments and simplifies the optical setup. Scanner orientation and trigger electrical signals are used to correct sinusoidal image warping and line sampling jitter. The instrument is demonstrated by imaging mice under 800 nm illumination with two reflectance detection modalities: confocal and quadrant non-confocal.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.