ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Mechanical de-skewing enables high-resolution imaging of thin tissue slices with a mesoSPIM light-sheet microscope.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optical clearing combined with light-sheet microscopy enables high-resolution imaging of extended tissue at scale. However, standard mesoSPIM systems are optimised for intact organs and are not suited to thin tissue slices. We present an oblique compensation scanning method using obliquely mounted samples held between refractive-index-matched slides in a 3D-printed frame. This enables mechanical de-skewing during acquisition, minimising post-processing requirements. We demonstrate feasibility in fluorescent bead phantoms and rabbit heart tissue, achieving a 4.8 × reduction in processing time and a 1.5 × improvement in axial resolution ((13.15±1.36) μm to (8.72±1.80) μm) compared to conventional
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.