ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
From virtual screening to animal models: chlorhexidine and indinavir as promising anti-Zika drug candidates.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is associated with severe neurological complications, but no clinically approved antiviral therapies exist, leaving management reliant on symptomatic support. The essential NS2B/NS3 protease represents a promising drug target for ZIKV. Methods: We performed structure-based virtual screening of 5,980 FDA-approved compounds from the ZINC database against the ZIKV NS2B/NS3 protease. Molecular docking identified 10 high-affinity candidates (LibDock score >150), which were subsequently evaluated for cytotoxicity and antiviral activity in Vero cells. The most promising compounds were further validated using immunofluorescence and Western blot assays. Their in vivo efficacy was assessed in a lethal AG6 mouse model. Results: Chlorhexidine and indinavir exhibited potent anti-ZIKV activity in vitro, with EC50 values of 16.41 µM and 12.8 µM, respectively, and favorable selectivity indices (CC50: 57.56 µM and 38.96 µM). Both compounds demonstrated a dose-dependent inhibition of ZIKV replication (5-40 µM) at the protein level. In the AG6 mouse model, treatment with either compound (50 mg/kg/day) significantly prolonged survival (p<0.001), delayed disease-associated weight loss, and reduced viral loads in key tissues compared to untreated controls. Discussion: Our integrated computational and experimental approach identifies chlorhexidine and indinavir as promising repurposed anti-ZIKV agents. While toxicity concerns require further investigation, these findings provide a validated foundation for the development of therapeutics against ZIKV infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.