ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2025
INTEGRATIVE ECOLOGICAL REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF U.S. COUNTY AND STATE LEVEL COVID-19 DEATH DATA FOR STUDYING HEALTH DISPARITY ASSOCIATIONS.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- INTEGRATIVE ECOLOGICAL REGRESSION ANALYSIS OF U.S. COUNTY AND STATE LEVEL COVID-19 DEATH DATA FOR STUDYING HEALTH DISPARITY ASSOCIATIONS.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is of substantial interest to study health disparity associations with COVID-19 death rates. Although high-quality individual-level COVID-19 epidemiological data have been difficult to collect on a national scale, all United States (U.S.) counties have reported total COVID-19 death counts. A standard ecological analysis would then regress county total death counts by county-level covariates such as age, sex, and race percentages. However, such an analysis is limited by ecological bias and fallacy in which estimated county-level associations are different from individual-level associations. Fortunately, state-level age, sex, and race specific COVID-19 death counts are also available for all U.S. states, so this information can be integrated with county-level data for more informative ecological analyses. We propose an approximate log-linear random effects model to jointly model county-level total death counts and state-level age, sex, and race specific death counts. We then develop a penalized composite log-likelihood method for parameter estimation and perform simulation studies to evaluate our proposed approach. Lastly, we analyze COVID-19 death data from the entire U.S., show how incorporating state-level counts can prevent ecological bias and fallacy, and illustrate the heterogeneity in health disparity associations across different U.S. states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.