Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41693780›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Data-driven strategies for immunoradiotherapy in uveal melanoma: the role of artificial intelligence.

Dongling Gu, Yi Feng, Hongyan Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dongling Gu *Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Yi Feng *Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Hongyan LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uveal melanoma (UM) represents the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults and remains a formidable clinical challenge due to its high metastatic potential and characteristically limited response to conventional systemic therapies. While the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy has emerged as a promising multimodal strategy for managing this complex malignancy, its efficacy is significantly constrained by profound individual variations in tumor biology, immune microenvironment composition, and dynamic treatment response patterns. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has fundamentally transformed the landscape of precision oncology by enabling sophisticated image analysis, robust data-driven prediction, and seamless integration of heterogeneous multi-omics information. Within the specific context of uveal melanoma, AI-driven computational models have demonstrated significant potential to accurately predict therapeutic outcomes, quantitatively characterize the tumor immune microenvironment, and optimize radiotherapeutic strategies on a personalized basis. This comprehensive review critically examines and synthesizes recent progress in AI applications for immunoradiotherapy in uveal melanoma, systematically exploring their transformative potential to refine diagnostic accuracy, enhance treatment precision, and ultimately improve long-term patient outcomes through intelligent, data-driven personalized medicine approaches that bridge multiple disciplinary boundaries.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceimmunoradiotherapypersonalized medicinetumor immune microenvironmentuveal melanoma

Identifiers

PMID41693780
PMCPMC12894365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.