Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41693738›Full record

ArticleDEN open2026

Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging for the Kyoto Classification of Gastritis: Evaluation of Visibility and Color Differences.

Shotaro Oki, Tsutomu Takeda, Yoichi Akazawa, Hiroya Ueyama, Yuji Ikeda, Shin Arii, Takeyasu Sai, Yasuko Uemura, Tomoyo Iwano, Momoko Yamamoto and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Shotaro OkiDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2517-8353
Tsutomu TakedaDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Yoichi AkazawaDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9343-5262
Hiroya UeyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-1009
Yuji IkedaDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Shin AriiDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Takeyasu SaiDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Yasuko UemuraDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Tomoyo IwanoDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Momoko YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9388-1788
Ryota UchidaDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5809-0059
Hisanori UtsunomiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9408-4628
Nobuyuki SuzukiDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Daiki AbeDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Atsushi IkedaDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Noboru YatagaiDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Kohei MatsumotoDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Kumiko UedaDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Mariko HojoDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Shuko NojiriDepartment of Medical Technology Innovation Center Juntendo University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Akihito NagaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine Tokyo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The Kyoto Classification of Gastritis enables endoscopic assessment of Methods: This was a retrospective analysis using prospectively collected endoscopic data from a prospective, single-center study, in which 220 patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy were enrolled. Endoscopic images were obtained using both white light imaging (WLI) and TXI (TXI-1 and TXI-2). Ten endoscopists (five experts and five trainees) independently evaluated 52 matched image sets, scoring visibility on a 5-point scale. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. Objective color analysis using the CIE L*a*b* color space and ΔE* values was also performed for map-like redness. Results: TXI-1 improved visibility for diffuse redness, spotty redness, map-like redness, patchy redness, atrophic border, red streak, and the regular arrangement of collecting venules. Visibility of intestinal metaplasia was also enhanced by TXI-1, although to a lesser extent than other findings. TXI-1 demonstrated "moderate" to "substantial" inter-rater reliability. Objective colorimetric analysis confirmed significantly greater ΔE* values with TXI-1 versus WLI for map-like redness. Conclusion: TXI-1 enhances the visibility of key endoscopic features of Trial Registration: The study protocol was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000045323).

Indexed as

color differenceinter‐rater reliabilityintra‐class correlation coefficientKyoto Classification of Gastritistexture and color enhancement imaging

Identifiers

PMID41693738
PMCPMC12906298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.