Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41693706›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2026

The effect of postoperative rehabilitation on outcomes in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM): A systematic review.

Chanelle Montpetit, Adam Kobaisi, Justin M Lantz, Rohil V Chauhan, David B Anderson, Maryse Fortin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chanelle MontpetitDepartment of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Adam KobaisiDepartment of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Justin M LantzUSC Spine Physical Therapy Fellowship Program, Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rohil V ChauhanDepartment of Orthopaedic Physiotherapy, Auckland Spine Surgery Centre, Auckland, New Zealand.
David B AndersonSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Maryse FortinDepartment of Health, Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is the leading cause of adult spinal cord dysfunction, often requiring surgery. However, the role of postoperative rehabilitation in optimizing patient outcomes remains unclear. Research question: What are the effects of postoperative rehabilitation on clinical outcomes following DCM surgery? Material and methods: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024582484). PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through September 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and other research on rehabilitation interventions for postoperative outcomes (e.g., function, pain, neurological recovery) in patients undergoing DCM surgery. Studies without confirmed DCM, non-peer-reviewed articles, or lacking a rehabilitation protocol were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. Descriptive summaries were conducted, categorizing studies into active, passive, and mixed interventions. The evidence quality was rated using the GRADE approach. Results: Ten studies with a total of 766 patients were included, made up of 5 RCTs and 5 cohort studies. Seven studies had high risk of bias, and three had moderate risk of bias. Mixed rehabilitation interventions combining physical, behavioral, and psychosocial strategies yielded the most consistent improvements in neurological function, quality of life, and self-efficacy. Intervention timing ranged from a few days postoperatively to 6 months. A meta-analysis was not performed due to study heterogeneity. Discussion and Conclusion: Postoperative rehabilitation for DCM shows promise, particularly with multimodal, goal-oriented, and patient-centered approaches. However, evidence is limited by the high risk of bias, poor methodological detail and lack of standardization.

Indexed as

Degenerative cervical myelopathyPostoperativeRehabilitationSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41693706
PMCPMC12906147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.