Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41693659›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2026

High-Throughput Proteomics Sample Preparation Using a 96-Channel Pipettor and Magnetic Pin Device.

Georgia Roumelioti, Alex Montoya, Gemma L M Fisher, Eneko Pascual Navarro, Angela Woods, Jane Bennett, Naveenan Navaratnam, Oliver Gonzalez-Carvajal, Jodie Birch, Elizabeth Pyman and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Georgia RoumeliotiMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Alex MontoyaMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Gemma L M FisherMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Eneko Pascual NavarroMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Angela WoodsMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Jane BennettMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Naveenan NavaratnamMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Oliver Gonzalez-CarvajalMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Jodie BirchMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Elizabeth PymanMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Sijia YuMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-3937-6676
Aleksandra GruevskaDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London W12 0NN, U.K.
Luc-Alban VuillemenotMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Oleh LushchakMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Zoe HallDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London W12 0NN, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-1434-8329
Alexis R BarrMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Christian SpeckMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Santiago VerniaMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-6728-5555
William R ScottMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Jesus GilMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Luis AragonMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
Louise FetsMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.
David CarlingMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-2316-1830
Pavel V ShliahaMRC Laboratory of Medical Sciences (LMS), London W12 0HS, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3092-0724

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput proteomics requires efficient and highly reproducible sample processing, yet workflows─particularly for PTM profiling─remain complex and costly to fully automate. Here, we present a practical intermediate solution using manually operated 96-channel devices: the Gilson Platemaster P220 pipettor and VP Scientific 96-well magnetic pin device. Using this setup, we achieved robust and reproducible phosphoproteomics in a 96-well format, completing protein aggregation capture (PAC/SP3) digestion, desalting, phosphopeptide enrichment, and a second desalting step within 2 days while minimizing operator workload and variability. Several innovations enable this workflow. First, we describe a cost-efficient method to generate 96-well solid-phase extraction plates by directly packing the Oasis HLB sorbent into tapered filter plates. We extensively characterize these plates in terms of loading capacity, lipid removal efficiency, and suitability for high-pH fractionation. Second, we demonstrate that efficient PAC digestion does not require continuous bead suspension; instead, digestion can be achieved by briefly aspirating beads in protease solution, eliminating the need for orbital shaking and simplifying automation. The presented workflow familiarizes users with 96-channel devices and hence serves as a good step toward full automation.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysProteomicsHumansPhosphopeptidesPhosphoproteinsSolid Phase ExtractionPhosphopeptidesPhosphoproteinshigh-throughput sample preparationoasis HLBPACphosphoproteomicsproteomicsSP3

Identifiers

PMID41693659
PMCPMC12973302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.