ArticleArthritis care & research2026
Variations in the Adult Rheumatology Fellowship Training in the United States: Opportunities and Challenges.
Article in Arthritis care & research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAdult rheumatology fellowship training programs in the United States exhibit considerable curricular diversity while staying within the framework provided by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). This study aims to characterize the variation in key training components across programs, providing a descriptive overview of current practices.
methodsWe developed a set of survey questions using Qualtrics to capture curricular elements among ACGME-accredited adult rheumatology fellowship programs in the United States. One current trainee from each program was invited to participate.
resultsWe received responses from 91 out of 126 programs available at the time of study, leading to a response rate of 72.2%. Although most programs incorporate core elements recommended by ACGME and ACR, substantial variability was observed in areas such as ambulatory and inpatient training, elective offerings, procedural experience, didactic structure, interdisciplinary exposure, mentorship, and research opportunities.
conclusionOur findings highlight the diverse approaches taken by rheumatology fellowship programs in structuring their curricula. Rather than advocating for uniformity, this variability may reflect the adaptability of programs to local resources and institutional strengths. Further exploration of how these differences influence educational outcomes could inform future efforts to enhance rheumatology training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.