Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41693409›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical pharmacology2026

Development of Pediatric Dosing for Mepolizumab in Severe Asthma Based on Extrapolation of Data From Adult Patients and a Phase II Open-Label Pediatric Trial.

Atul Gupta, Isabelle J Pouliquen, Wanda Phipatanakul, Daren Austin, Glenn Whelan, Robert G Price, Tricia Finney-Hayward, Sabine Derey, Jonathan Steinfeld

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Strategies for pediatric dose derivation from population pharmacokinetic models.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Atul GuptaPaediatric Respiratory Department, King's College Hospital, Department of Women and Children's Health, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1610-0335
Isabelle J PouliquenResearch & Development, GSK, London, UK.
Wanda PhipatanakulDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8639-0473
Daren AustinResearch & Development, GSK, London, UK.
Glenn WhelanRespiratory Biologics, GSK, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, USA.
Robert G PriceBiostatistics, GSK, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6418-6818
Tricia Finney-HaywardGlobal Medical Affairs, GSK, London, UK.
Sabine DereyGlobal Regulatory Affairs, GSK, Rueil-Malmaison, France.
Jonathan SteinfeldResearch & Development, GSK, Collegeville, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The benefit-risk profile of mepolizumab in severe asthma was established through clinical trials in adults, leading to EU and US approvals in 2015. To support a pediatric indication (≥6 years), an extrapolation approach was implemented. This extrapolation and its validation were informed by data from Phase III trials in adults (N = 1841) and adolescents aged 12-17 years (N = 37) with severe asthma, an open-label trial in children aged 6-11 years (N = 36), and a trial in children aged 2-11 years (N = 32) and adolescents aged 12-17 years (N = 27) with eosinophilic esophagitis. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic meta-analyses demonstrated consistent mepolizumab pharmacokinetic and blood eosinophil reduction across age groups and diseases, with bodyweight the only covariate of exposure and absolute bioavailability also a covariate in children aged 6-11 years. Baseline blood eosinophil count and disease type were the only covariates of response. In severe asthma, mepolizumab reduced the annualized rate of clinically significant exacerbations by 40% in adolescents and 54% in adults versus placebo. Bootstrap resampling and Bayesian analyses supported similar efficacy between adolescents and adults, and responses in children aged 6-11 years were consistent with older groups. Safety evaluations revealed no unique safety concerns in pediatric patients with severe asthma. This extrapolation strategy, implemented as an innovative approach to pediatric clinical development of mepolizumab in severe asthma, was validated and provided the scientific basis for dosing recommendations and for EU regulatory approval in patients aged ≥6 years in 2018.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAsthmaAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolEosinophilsFemaleHumansMaleSeverity of Illness IndexAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedmepolizumabAsthma Control QuestionnaireBayesianblood eosinophil countbootstrapclinically significant exacerbationpharmacodynamicpharmacokinetic

Identifiers

PMID41693409
PMCPMC12907775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.