Trial reportJournal of clinical pharmacology2026
Development of Pediatric Dosing for Mepolizumab in Severe Asthma Based on Extrapolation of Data From Adult Patients and a Phase II Open-Label Pediatric Trial.
Trial report in Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategies for pediatric dose derivation from population pharmacokinetic models.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026Article
- Review
- Mepolizumab in Pediatric Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Clinical Applications.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The benefit-risk profile of mepolizumab in severe asthma was established through clinical trials in adults, leading to EU and US approvals in 2015. To support a pediatric indication (≥6 years), an extrapolation approach was implemented. This extrapolation and its validation were informed by data from Phase III trials in adults (N = 1841) and adolescents aged 12-17 years (N = 37) with severe asthma, an open-label trial in children aged 6-11 years (N = 36), and a trial in children aged 2-11 years (N = 32) and adolescents aged 12-17 years (N = 27) with eosinophilic esophagitis. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic meta-analyses demonstrated consistent mepolizumab pharmacokinetic and blood eosinophil reduction across age groups and diseases, with bodyweight the only covariate of exposure and absolute bioavailability also a covariate in children aged 6-11 years. Baseline blood eosinophil count and disease type were the only covariates of response. In severe asthma, mepolizumab reduced the annualized rate of clinically significant exacerbations by 40% in adolescents and 54% in adults versus placebo. Bootstrap resampling and Bayesian analyses supported similar efficacy between adolescents and adults, and responses in children aged 6-11 years were consistent with older groups. Safety evaluations revealed no unique safety concerns in pediatric patients with severe asthma. This extrapolation strategy, implemented as an innovative approach to pediatric clinical development of mepolizumab in severe asthma, was validated and provided the scientific basis for dosing recommendations and for EU regulatory approval in patients aged ≥6 years in 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.