Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41693282›Full record

ArticleTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society

Utilization of a CMV T Cell Immunity Assay to Guide Secondary Prophylaxis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Christina Doligalski, Luther Bartelt, Anne M Lachiewicz, Arlene C Seña, Mary Chandran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina DoligalskiDepartment of Pharmacy, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6688-8573
Luther BarteltDepartment of Medicine, UNC Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7596-4272
Anne M LachiewiczDepartment of Medicine, UNC Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5229-6438
Arlene C SeñaDepartment of Medicine, UNC Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-2175
Mary ChandranDepartment of Pharmacy, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4309-7896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSecondary prophylaxis following treatment of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) may be considered in high-risk SOTRs, although utilization criteria are not well described. The addition of CMV-specific T-cell immunity assay testing may help guide selection of SOTRs for secondary prophylaxis.

methodsAll SOTRs at a single center with CMV T-cell assays obtained during secondary prophylaxis between January 2020 and August 2023 were reviewed. CMV antiviral secondary prophylaxis discontinuation rates and subsequent need for antiviral therapy re-initiation were recorded. Positive predictive and negative predictive values of the assay, as well as the association between absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and CMV T cell assay variables, were assessed.

resultsCMV T-cell assay results in 32/78 (41%) SOTRs showed adequate response. Secondary prophylaxis was discontinued in 27 (84.4%) with adequate and 13 (28.2%) with inadequate T-cell response (p < 0.005). CMV DNAemia requiring re-initiation of CMV therapy occurred in 2/27 (7.4%) of the adequate and 3/13 (23.1%) of the inadequate response cohorts (p = 0.056), demonstrating a PPV and NPV of 92.6% and 23.1%, respectively, with 71.4% sensitivity and 60% specificity. When combined with ALC > 0.5 10

conclusionIn this exploratory population, the combination of an adequate CMV T-cell assay with adequate ALC was strongly predictive of no CMV reactivation. Further investigation into the predictive characteristics of a CMV T-cell assay combined with ALC and other patient-specific factors may optimize its clinical application.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCytomegalovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsOrgan TransplantationSecondary PreventionT-LymphocytesAdultAgedBreakthrough InfectionsDNA, ViralFemaleHumansLymphocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsAntiviral AgentsDNA, Viralabsolute lymphocyte countCMVCMV T cell assaysecondary prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID41693282
PMCPMC13570380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.