ArticleTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
Utilization of a CMV T Cell Immunity Assay to Guide Secondary Prophylaxis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.
Article in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSecondary prophylaxis following treatment of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) may be considered in high-risk SOTRs, although utilization criteria are not well described. The addition of CMV-specific T-cell immunity assay testing may help guide selection of SOTRs for secondary prophylaxis.
methodsAll SOTRs at a single center with CMV T-cell assays obtained during secondary prophylaxis between January 2020 and August 2023 were reviewed. CMV antiviral secondary prophylaxis discontinuation rates and subsequent need for antiviral therapy re-initiation were recorded. Positive predictive and negative predictive values of the assay, as well as the association between absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and CMV T cell assay variables, were assessed.
resultsCMV T-cell assay results in 32/78 (41%) SOTRs showed adequate response. Secondary prophylaxis was discontinued in 27 (84.4%) with adequate and 13 (28.2%) with inadequate T-cell response (p < 0.005). CMV DNAemia requiring re-initiation of CMV therapy occurred in 2/27 (7.4%) of the adequate and 3/13 (23.1%) of the inadequate response cohorts (p = 0.056), demonstrating a PPV and NPV of 92.6% and 23.1%, respectively, with 71.4% sensitivity and 60% specificity. When combined with ALC > 0.5 10
conclusionIn this exploratory population, the combination of an adequate CMV T-cell assay with adequate ALC was strongly predictive of no CMV reactivation. Further investigation into the predictive characteristics of a CMV T-cell assay combined with ALC and other patient-specific factors may optimize its clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.