ArticleHuman brain mapping2026
Phase-Specific Dual-Site Beta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Differentially Influences Functional Connectivity Associated With Motor Inhibition Performance.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision non-invasive transcranial electromagnetic stimulation: a thematic review of optimizing spatial, temporal, and dose dimensions.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Review
- Phase-Specific Dual-Site Beta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Differentially Influences Functional Connectivity Associated With Motor Inhibition Performance.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Variable E-field properties of dual-site tACS with phase lags.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inhibitory control relies on coordinated beta-band activity within a fronto-basal ganglia network, which implements inhibition via downstream effects on (pre)motor areas. However, the causal role of beta synchrony in motor inhibition remains unclear. In this study, we employed dual-site transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) targeting the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) and left primary motor cortex (lM1) to directly manipulate phase relationships in the beta band and assess their effects on both functional connectivity and motor inhibition. Fifty-two healthy participants received in-phase, anti-phase, and sham stimulation while performing a stop-signal task. Connectivity between rIFG and lM1 increased following in-phase stimulation and decreased after anti-phase stimulation. No significant group-level effects on stop-signal task performance were observed. Exploratory Δ-Δ correlations indicated that individuals with larger connectivity increases during in-phase stimulation tended to show greater improvements in inhibitory performance, whereas greater connectivity decreases during anti-phase stimulation were associated with faster go responses. Crucially, ANCOVA analyses revealed significant stimulation-dependent changes in the slope of the connectivity-behavior relationship, demonstrating that tACS altered how beta synchrony predicted inhibitory and motor performance despite unchanged mean behavior. These findings suggest that dual-site beta-tACS can bidirectionally modulate rIFG-M1 connectivity in a phase-dependent manner and selectively alter how beta synchrony predicts stopping and motor execution. This mechanistic insight may inform future research exploring dual-site beta-tACS as a tool to probe or potentially normalize inhibitory network dynamics in disorders characterized by impaired inhibition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.