ArticlePsychophysiology2026
Acoustic Features of Emotional Vocalizations Account for Early Modulations of Event-Related Brain Potentials.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acoustic Features of Emotional Vocalizations Account for Early Modulations of Event-Related Brain Potentials.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotion is key to human communication, and inferring emotion in a speaker's voice is a cross-cultural and cross-linguistic capability. Electroencephalography (EEG) studies of neural mechanisms supporting emotion perception have reported that early components of the event-related potential (ERP) are modulated by emotion. However, the nature of emotion's effect, especially on the P200 component, is disputed. We hypothesized that early acoustic features of emotional utterances might account for ERP modulations previously attributed to emotion. We recorded multi-channel EEG from healthy participants (n = 30) tasked with recognizing the emotion of utterances. We used 50 vocalizations in five emotions-anger, happiness, neutral, sadness and pleasure-drawn from the Montreal Affective Voices dataset. We statistically quantified instantaneous associations between ERP amplitudes, emotion categories, and acoustic features, specifically, intensity, pitch, first formant, and second formant. We found that shortly after utterance onset (120-250 ms, i.e., P200, early P300) ERP amplitude for sad vocalizations was less than for other emotional categories. Moreover, ERP amplitude at around 180 ms for happy vocalization was less than for anger, sadness, and pleasure. Our analysis showed that acoustic intensity explains most of these early-latency effects. We also found that, at longer latency (220-500 ms; late P200, P300) ERP amplitude for neutral vocalizations was less than for other emotional categories. Furthermore, there were also ERP differences between anger and happiness, anger and pleasure, anger and sadness, happiness and pleasure, as well as happiness and sadness in shorter windows during this late period. Acoustic pitch and, to a lesser degree, acoustic intensity explain most of these later effects. We conclude that acoustic features can account for early ERP modulations evoked by emotional utterances. Because previous studies used a variety of stimuli, our result likely resolves previous disputes on emotion's effect on P200.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.