Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41693238›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2026

The Thymus Regeneration Paradox: The Search for Stemness in an Involuting Organ.

Roberta Ragazzini, Paola Bonfanti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Roberta RagazziniEpithelial Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Paola BonfantiEpithelial Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-3766

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/U536817/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/Y026543/1H2020 European Research Council ERC-StG 639429H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions MSC-IF 896014Innovate UK 10005465Innovate UK 10032909Medical Research Council MC_PC_17180Medical Research Council MR/Z505808/1Rosetrees Trust CF/100014Rosetrees Trust CF-2023-M-2\114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The thymus is emerging as a model for studying organ regeneration and stem cell biology. While research has long focused on how antigen-presenting cells shape the T cell repertoire, recent discoveries unveil a far richer cellular landscape that challenges long-held views of thymus structure and function. This review traces the history of early thymic reconstitution assays, the paradigm of clonal stem cells and serial transplantation, assessing evidence for "stemness" within the thymus. A key focus is the paradox that an involuting thymus retains cells able to expand in culture and reconstitute organ function. We differentiate embryonic/fetal thymus development from postnatal homeostasis, emphasizing how the potency of epithelial progenitor/stem cells shifts with age or upon injury. The role of mesenchymal/interstitial cells and the extracellular milieu is considered alongside advances in organ reconstruction. We outline major unsolved questions in the field: thymus regeneration after childhood; the minimal components required to generate functional naïve T cells outside the body; and the potential of next-generation humanized mouse models to interrogate immune tolerance and novel immunotherapies. We argue that thymus research is entering a new era, one in which understanding and harnessing thymus regenerative potential could yield transformative advances in both basic science and clinical applications.

Indexed as

RegenerationStem CellsThymus GlandT-LymphocytesAnimalsCell DifferentiationHumansepithelial stem cellsextracellular matrixin vitro clonal assayinvolution and regenerationthymuswhole‐organ reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID41693238
PMCPMC12907622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.