Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41693197›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2026

Sex Differences in Lung Immunity.

Franz Puttur, Clare M Lloyd

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex Differences in Lung Immunity.Immunological reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Clinical predictors of impaired pulmonary diffusing capacity in patients recovering from COVID-19: A secondary analysis of multicentre datasets.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Franz PutturNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2058-8521
Clare M LloydNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-6726

Funding

Asthma and Lung UK ECSG24∖26Wellcome Trust 107059/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 220254/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological sex has a significant impact on how the immune system develops and responds to foreign and self-antigens. Sex differences exist in innate and adaptive immune cells, both at homeostasis and in the context of infection and inflammatory diseases such as asthma, cancer, and autoimmune disorders. Women generate stronger immune responses and are more susceptible to developing autoimmune conditions, while males are more prone to acute viral infections and developing certain cancers. Some immunological differences persist throughout life, while others emerge only after puberty and before reproductive senescence. Additionally, environmental exposures can affect the influence of biological sex in regulating immune function. This is particularly pertinent at mucosal surfaces such as the lungs, where lung immune defenses are constantly exposed to foreign material during respiration. Consequently, environmental factors together with genetics, age and sex hormones play a vital role in governing lung tissue immune responses between the sexes. In this context, we highlight studies that support the need for considering sex as an important biological variable in lung immunological research. This knowledge will provide a benchmark for understanding sex-driven immunological mechanisms that underpin disease development and may inform new avenues targeted for generating sex-specific therapies in lung disease.

Indexed as

ImmunityLungLung DiseasesSex CharacteristicsAdaptive ImmunityAnimalsDisease SusceptibilityFemaleGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansImmunity, InnateMaleSex FactorsGonadal Steroid Hormonesagingallergybiological sexinflammationlungprocessessex hormonestissues

Identifiers

PMID41693197
PMCPMC12907607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.