ReviewMicrobial biotechnology2026
Recent Developments in HIV Antivirals: The Prospect of Prophylactic Drugs to Change the Pandemic.
Review in Microbial biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Developments in HIV Antivirals: The Prospect of Prophylactic Drugs to Change the Pandemic.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Review
- Cutting-edge developments in computer-aided anti-HIV drug design.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human immunodeficiency-1 virus was identified in 1983 as the etiological agent of AIDS. Four years later, the first HIV-1 antiviral drug was approved: the nucleoside analog zidovudine inhibiting the viral reverse transcriptase (RT). Subsequently, non-nucleoside inhibitors of RT, viral protease, viral integrase, and viral entry inhibitors were approved as antiviral drugs. Combining these drugs into a highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) decreased the viral load in chronically infected patients and suppressed AIDS defining symptoms. HAART became a medical success story, but the chronic HIV infection cannot be cured by antiviral drugs. Therefore, substantial efforts were undertaken to use antiviral drugs prophylactically to prevent HIV infections in high-risk groups. PreExposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) with oral combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) showed some success in preventing infections in infants born to HIV-infected mothers, decreased the rate of HIV infection in men having sex with men, in women having sex with men, in couples discordant for HIV status and in intravenous drug users. However, the daily burden of pill swallowing compromised seriously the adherence of people to antiviral drugs. The development of injectable long-acting antiviral drugs based on the integrase inhibitor cabotegravir, which needs an injection every 2 months, or the viral capsid inhibitor lenacapavir, injected every half year, showed impressive results in prevention trials with men and women at high risk of infection. The present article describes aspects of HIV antiviral drug development, the outcome of pertinent clinical trials, and discusses economic and political hurdles for injected long-acting antivirals to become a gamechanger for the HIV pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.