ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2026
Motor, Cognitive, Psychological, and Neural Predictors of Concern About Falling in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BackgroundConcern about falling (CAF) is highly prevalent in multiple sclerosis (MS) and is linked to poor motor, cognitive, and psychological functioning. Although CAF has been associated with impairments in these domains, the unique and combined contributions of motor, cognitive, psychological, and neural factors remain unclear. This study used a comprehensive approach to identify behavioral and neural predictors of CAF.MethodsForty-three individuals with MS completed motor, cognitive, and psychological assessments, and underwent a structural magnetic resonance imaging scan. Linear regression models examined domain-specific predictors of CAF, controlling for disease severity. A discriminant function analysis (DFA) evaluated the combined predictive value of all variables in classifying individuals into high versus low CAF groups based on a median split.ResultsCAF was significantly associated with impairments across all behavioral domains (|
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.