Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41693081›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026

Automated Calculation of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score in the Intensive Care Unit: Algorithm Development, Validation, and Association With 30-Day Mortality.

Johan Helleberg, Anna Sundelin, Navid Soltani, Ragnar Thobaben, Johan Mårtensson, Olav Rooyackers

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johan HellebergDepartment of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna SundelinSection of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0007-2508-5599
Navid SoltaniSection of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0008-6635-5804
Ragnar ThobabenDivision of Information Science and Engineering, Digital Futures Faculty, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan MårtenssonSection of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Olav RooyackersDepartment of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3391-5448

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is routinely used in the intensive care unit (ICU) to describe severity of organ dysfunction, for prognostication and sepsis diagnosis, and in clinical trials. Inter-rater variability and scalability are known challenges in manual assessment. We aimed to develop and validate an algorithm for automatic SOFA calculation and evaluated its predictive abilities on 30-day mortality.

methodsRetrospective multi-center cohort study on all adult patients admitted to four ICUs at the Karolinska University Hospitals in 2015-2018. Data from 2018 collected in one ICU was used for algorithm development. The algorithm was validated by comparing the results of automated SOFA score calculation to those obtained by manual SOFA scoring by experienced intensivists on 300 randomly chosen ICU days from the remaining cohort. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC [95% confidence interval (CI)]) was calculated as primary validation outcome. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC [95% CI]) was used for assessment of 30-day mortality prediction on the remaining cohort (excluding only the development cohort).

resultsA total of 6953 ICU admissions were included. The algorithm was developed on 613 admissions during 2018. Data from the remaining cohort with 6340 admissions (5076 patients, 36,625 ICU days) were used for mortality prediction. On algorithm validation of the full SOFA score, the ICC was 0.99 (0.98-1.00). For 30-day mortality, the best predictive abilities were found with maximum SOFA score (AUROC 0.79 [0.78-0.81]) and with SOFA score on Day 2 (AUROC 0.79 [0.77-0.80]).

conclusionA trustworthy automated SOFA score dataset can be produced with comprehensive high-frequency electronic health records curation and rigorous artifact control, with accuracy comparable to manual scoring by senior intensivists. Association between SOFA score and 30-day mortality in a large, real-world clinical cohort aligns with findings from previous clinical trials. The results support the use of automated SOFA scoring as a reliable tool for clinical research, quality monitoring, and potentially real-time clinical decision support. EDITORIAL COMMENT: In this article, the authors report results of a retrospective multicenter study, where they used a large cohort of adult ICU patients for developing and validating an automated algorithm for calculating SOFA scores. In validation, they found that the automatically calculated score was comparable to scores manually calculated by experienced clinicians. The automatically calculated maximum SOFA and Day 2 SOFA scores performed well in predicting 30-day mortality.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsIntensive Care UnitsMultiple Organ FailureOrgan Dysfunction ScoresAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41693081
PMCPMC12907534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.