ReviewSmall methods2026
Methodological Frameworks for Computational Electrocatalysis: From Theory to Practice.
Review in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Tutorial Review of Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian Processes to Accelerate Stationary Point Searches.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modeling electrocatalytic reactions at solid-liquid interfaces requires capturing both the quantum-mechanical processes at the electrode surface and the complex response of the surrounding electrochemical environment. This review examines the main theoretical frameworks and computational techniques used to describe such systems, focusing on first-principles approaches based on density functional theory (DFT). Key aspects include the treatment of reaction thermodynamics, electrode bias, solvation effects, electrolyte screening, and reaction kinetics. A broad range of methods is discussed, from thermochemical models, such as the computational hydrogen electrode, to potential-dependent formulations based on grand-canonical DFT and explicit calculation of kinetic barriers. The review also highlights recent machine-learning approaches for catalyst screening and the growing use of machine-learning-based force fields, which promise to enable efficient simulations of complex electrochemical environments over extended time and length scales with near-first-principles accuracy. The aim is not only to present the state of the art, but also to clarify the physical assumptions and approximations underlying each approach. The influence of modeling choices on reliability and computational cost is examined in detail. Alongside theoretical aspects, practical considerations are emphasized to support researchers in selecting appropriate methods and designing simulations that are both physically meaningful and computationally tractable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.