Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41693058›Full record

ReviewSmall methods2026

Methodological Frameworks for Computational Electrocatalysis: From Theory to Practice.

Michele Re Fiorentin, Michele G Bianchi, Magnus A H Christiansen, Anna Ciotti, Francesca Risplendi, Wei Wang, Elvar Ö Jónsson, Hannes Jónsson, Giancarlo Cicero

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michele Re FiorentinDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Michele G BianchiDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7432-5575
Magnus A H ChristiansenScience Institute and Faculty of Physical, Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9837-3469
Anna CiottiDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6333-3951
Francesca RisplendiDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7296-3987
Wei WangDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3062-7074
Elvar Ö JónssonScience Institute and Faculty of Physical, Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Hannes JónssonScience Institute and Faculty of Physical, Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Giancarlo CiceroDepartment of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2920-9882

Funding

COST CA24103HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions 101072830Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca 2022FM3LXTRannís 2410644-051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling electrocatalytic reactions at solid-liquid interfaces requires capturing both the quantum-mechanical processes at the electrode surface and the complex response of the surrounding electrochemical environment. This review examines the main theoretical frameworks and computational techniques used to describe such systems, focusing on first-principles approaches based on density functional theory (DFT). Key aspects include the treatment of reaction thermodynamics, electrode bias, solvation effects, electrolyte screening, and reaction kinetics. A broad range of methods is discussed, from thermochemical models, such as the computational hydrogen electrode, to potential-dependent formulations based on grand-canonical DFT and explicit calculation of kinetic barriers. The review also highlights recent machine-learning approaches for catalyst screening and the growing use of machine-learning-based force fields, which promise to enable efficient simulations of complex electrochemical environments over extended time and length scales with near-first-principles accuracy. The aim is not only to present the state of the art, but also to clarify the physical assumptions and approximations underlying each approach. The influence of modeling choices on reliability and computational cost is examined in detail. Alongside theoretical aspects, practical considerations are emphasized to support researchers in selecting appropriate methods and designing simulations that are both physically meaningful and computationally tractable.

Indexed as

computational methodsdensity functional theoryelectrochemical interface modelingmachine learning in atomistic simulations

Identifiers

PMID41693058
PMCPMC12972284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.