SynthesisThe Gerontologist2026
There, but not there: older people in anti-ageism interventions.
Synthesis in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Older people's experiences of and reactions to ageism.Innovation in aging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is growing attention to anti-ageism interventions, and evidence is mounting that education and contact with older people can reduce ageism. Yet outcomes in these interventions focus mainly on younger people and service providers, although older people are essential ingredients in the interventions. We argue that the lack of attention to older adults is a missed opportunity to improve older participants' attitudes toward younger people and perhaps attain other benefits from intergenerational engagement. We repurposed the systematic review of Apriceno and Levy that focused on interventions to reduce ageism toward older people, and we studied the roles and outcomes experienced by the older participants in these interventions. Systematic attention to older participants is lacking, and their experiences and outcomes are not usually considered. In the small number of studies that assessed older participants, the results are promising. However, weaknesses in theoretical and empirical approaches abound in this literature. We urge scholars to elevate attention to older participants in anti-ageism interventions, develop programs with clear theoretical foundations as to outcomes expected for older as well as younger participants, and strengthen research designs and measurement, with the goal of promoting a more collaborative and inclusive society across all age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.