ArticleThe Gerontologist2026
Applying the WHO's framework for age-friendly environments: older adults' perspective in a rural setting.
Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe World Health Organization (WHO) has outlined eight domains central to age-friendly environments. Since their introduction in 2007, developments have focused mainly on urban areas. This study explores which factors older adults view as crucial for creating age-friendly environments in a rural Swedish context. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsThis qualitative study consisted of five focus groups with 17 participants. A deductive approach was used for the analysis.
resultsDiscussions were linked to all eight WHO domains, with a particular emphasis on digitalization, transportation, and discrimination, especially related to digital and social inclusion, which cut across several domains. For instance, digitalization influenced both transportation and communication in rural areas with long distances and limited services. Social inclusion and non-discrimination highlighted the need for greater adaptation within specific domains, especially for people with mobility limitations, declining health, or financial difficulties. Overlaps among domains were evident, such as the need for accessible and affordable transport to enable healthcare access and social participation. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: To create age-friendly rural environments, adaptations are needed within all domains in the WHO framework. Digitalization should be emphasized to enable inclusion and reduce discrimination. Accessible and affordable transportation is also crucial for older adults to participate socially, engage civically, and access healthcare. The WHO framework appears sufficient in a rural context. Therefore, we suggest using the framework for age-friendly environments in practice to consider aspects of the environment that older adults perceive as important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.