Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41692970›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

scMix: learning temporal dynamics of gene expression under irregular time intervals.

Shangjin Han, Dongsup Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shangjin HanDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, South Korea.
Dongsup KimDepartment of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST, Daejeon 34141, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5916-6799

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea grants funded by Korean Government RS-2024-00344154National Research Foundation of Korea grants funded by Korean Government RS-2024-00399520National Research Foundation of Korea grants funded by Korean Government RS-2025-00523107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationUnderstanding temporal gene expression is fundamental in the study of cellular development and differentiation. In practice, temporal single-cell datasets tend to contain only a limited number of measured time points, which are often unevenly spaced, resulting in irregular intervals between observations due to experimental constraints. Existing methods typically address these intervals by sequentially predicting one time point after another, yet lack mechanisms to explicitly model time intervals, leading to error accumulation.

resultsIn this work, we introduce scMix, a language-model-based framework for predicting single-cell gene expression, which enables prediction from multiple historical time points. We build scMix on the Receptance Weighted Key Value architecture and use its time decay mechanism to model temporal dependencies over time. Moreover, scMix proposes a delta-time mechanism that allows the model to bypass unmeasured time points, reducing error accumulation and improving robustness. In addition, we incorporate a trend regularization strategy to enhance the temporal coherence of predicted gene expression trajectories. scMix demonstrates state-of-the-art performance in predicting gene expression at unmeasured time points, surpassing existing methods, and also achieves outstanding results on downstream tasks. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code used for this study is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18287184.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingSoftwareAlgorithmsSingle-Cell Gene Expression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41692970
PMCPMC12970592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.