Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41692940›Full record

ReviewScience China. Life sciences2026

A review of computational approaches for metagenomics by long-read sequencing.

Baichen Le, Longhao Jia, Tianxiang Pang, Shuwen Han, Yiqian Duan, Xing-Ming Zhao

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Science China. Life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Baichen Le *Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Longhao Jia *Huzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Tianxiang PangHuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China.
Shuwen HanHuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China. shuwenhan985@163.com.
Yiqian DuanHuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China. yqduan20@fudan.edu.cn.
Xing-Ming ZhaoHuzhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Central Hospital of Huzhou University, Huzhou, 313000, China. xmzhao@fudan.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), also known as short-read sequencing (SRS), is widely used to explore microbial composition and function. However, short reads, due to their difficulty in crossing repetitive regions, can lead to fragmented assemblies, hampering the comprehensive characterization of microbial genomes. In contrast, long-read sequencing (LRS) technologies, such as those from Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) and Oxford Nanopore, can span these complex repetitive regions and reconstruct continuous genomes, which enables high-resolution taxonomic classification and the precise recovery of essential genetic elements. This review provides a systematic overview of the computational approaches for long-read metagenomics, highlighting the progress in taxonomic profiling strategies, assembly and binning methods, and the detection of genetic elements. Furthermore, the review discusses the application of LRS in detecting structural variations (SVs), identifying methylation patterns, and characterizing strains. By combining advanced technologies and computational improvements, this review indicates the transformative potential of LRS in enhancing our understanding of microbial diversity, functions, and interactions within microbial communities.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomicsHumansMicrobiotaSequence Analysis, DNAlong-read sequencingmetagenomicsmicrobiome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.