ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Age disparity in robotic colorectal surgery: overcoming surgeon hesitancy to improve elderly patient outcomes.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRobotic colorectal surgery offers significant benefits for vulnerable elderly patients, but its adoption in this demographic appears limited. We hypothesized that a significant age-related disparity exists in robotic surgery utilization. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between age and the use of robotic surgery, along with its associated postoperative outcomes in elderly patients.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study utilized the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2021. We analyzed 80,187 patients aged 65 years or older undergoing elective colectomy or proctectomy. The primary endpoint was the utilization of the robotic surgical approach. Key secondary endpoints included in-hospital mortality, medical and surgical complications, and length of hospital stay.
resultsOlder age was independently associated with a decreased likelihood of undergoing robotic surgery (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97–0.98; p < 0.001). Compared to open and laparoscopic approaches, robotic surgery was associated with significantly lower odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.709, 95% CI 0.578–0.870; p = 0.001), medical complications (OR 0.790, 95% CI 0.723–0.863; p < 0.001), and surgical complications (OR 0.713, 95% CI 0.669–0.759; p < 0.001). The robotic approach was also associated with a shorter length of hospital stay (OR 0.819, 95% CI 0.804–0.834; p < 0.001).
conclusionA significant age-related disparity exists in the use of robotic colorectal surgery. Elderly patients are less likely to undergo this procedure despite its association with improved postoperative outcomes. Overcoming surgeon hesitancy and systemic barriers is necessary to ensure older adults have equitable access to the benefits of advanced surgical technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41692915What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.