ArticleScientific reports2026
Hybrid deep learning novel framework for classification of parkinson's disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects the motor system and is often difficult to diagnose in its early stages due to subtle and age-overlapping symptoms. To address this challenge, we propose a hybrid deep learning-based diagnostic framework using T2-weighted MRI scans from the PPMI dataset consisting of 77 healthy control (HC) and 223 Parkinson’s disease (PD) subjects. The images undergo standardized preprocessing, including intensity normalization and contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE), to enhance structural visibility in the midbrain region. A hybrid architecture combining EfficientNetB0 for deep feature extraction with an XGBoost classifier is introduced to improve class discrimination across four categories: HCF, HCNF, PDF, and PDNF. The proposed model achieves a testing accuracy of 99.02%, demonstrating strong performance with high precision, recall, and F1-scores across all classes. These results highlight the significance of the hybrid approach in effectively handling limited and imbalanced MRI datasets while improving early PD detection. The framework shows strong potential for deployment as a fast, reliable, and clinically adaptable diagnostic tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.