Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41692877›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Prediction of under-five mortality using supervised machine learning algorithms in the 23 sub-Sharan African countries.

Angwach Abrham Asnake, Alemayehu Kasu Gebrehana, Zufan Alamrie Asmare, Beminate Lemma Seifu, Hiwot Altaye Asebe, Meklit Melaku Bezie, Sintayehu Simie Tsega, Yohannes Mekuria Negussie, Mamaru Melkam, Bezawit Melak Fente

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Angwach Abrham AsnakeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences and Medicine, Wolaita Sodo University, Wolaita Sodo, Ethiopia. angwachabrham@gmail.com.
Alemayehu Kasu GebrehanaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Health science, Salale University, Fitche, Ethiopia.
Zufan Alamrie AsmareDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine and Health Science, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Beminate Lemma SeifuDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Samara University, Samara, Ethiopia.
Hiwot Altaye AsebeDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Samara University, Samara, Ethiopia.
Meklit Melaku BezieDepartment of Public Health Officer, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Sintayehu Simie TsegaDepartment of Medical Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Yohannes Mekuria NegussieDepartment of Medicine, Adama General Hospital and Medical College, Adama, Ethiopia.
Mamaru MelkamCollege of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Psychiatry, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Bezawit Melak FenteDepartment of General Midwifery, School of Midwifery, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under-five mortality remains a critical public health concern in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), ranges from 59 to 230 per 1000 live births in different nations of SSA. Despite substantial efforts to reduce child mortality, progress in many SSA countries has been uneven and slow. Existing predictive models often fall short due to small sample sizes, and a lack of interpretability. Moreover, most studies have not leveraged large-scale, nationally representative datasets or applied robust machine learning (ML) frameworks. This study addresses these gaps by applying ML techniques to a large dataset to predict under-five mortality and identify key contributing factors. This study utilized the recent (2015–2024) Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 23 SSA, incorporating a total weighted sample of 190,930 participants. About seven supervised ML algorithms were employed, applying data balancing, hyperparameter tuning, and model interpretability using SHAP values. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC. This study results indicate random forest classifier demonstrated superior predictive performance (i.e., Accuracy = 0.9421, Precision = 0.9193, Recall = 0.9687, F1-score = 0.9433, and AUC = 0.9678) compared to other models. The SHAP waterfall plot provides a local explanation for a single high-risk case. Individual features such as poor healthcare access, younger maternal age at first birth (below 18 years), and poorest wealth status increased the predicted risk of under-five mortality, while protective features like belongs to maternal age 25–29 years reduce the risk of under-five mortality. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of ML models in predicting under-five mortality in SSA. Among the seven supervised classification algorithms applied, the random forest classifier exhibited the highest predictive performance. The use of SHAP values provided valuable insights into the most influential predictors, such as healthcare access, age at first birth and wealth status highlighting their significant role in child survival. By leveraging ML techniques, this research offers a data-driven approach to identifying at-risk children and informing targeted public health interventions.

Indexed as

Child MortalityInfant MortalitySupervised Machine LearningAfrica South of the SaharaChild, PreschoolClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestAnd sub-Sharan africaMachine learningPredictionUnder-five mortality

Identifiers

PMID41692877
PMCPMC12996318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.