Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41692869›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Factor-based reperforation timing after tympanoplasty: a graft survival analysis.

Fatih Gül, Serkan Şerifler, Kadir Şinasi Bulut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fatih GülDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Lokman Hekim University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. drfatihgul@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7992-0974
Serkan ŞeriflerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0771-7373
Kadir Şinasi BulutDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4145-8339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the impact of risk factors on the timing of reperforation (RP) after tympanoplasty and to determine the optimal follow-up intervals.

methodsThis retrospective study included 403 patients who underwent tympanoplasty with at least 2 years of follow-up. The patients were divided into RP (n = 32) and non-RP (n = 371) groups. Data on age, sex, BMI, diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, smoking, atopy, perforation size and type, and middle ear status were collected based on factors previously reported to affect the graft outcomes. Group comparisons were made to identify factors associated with RP. Time-to-event analysis (Kaplan–Meier) was used to assess the effect of variables on RP timing, and linear regression was conducted to determine predictors of shorter RP time.

resultsOf 403 patients, 32 experienced RP. Larger (> 50%), marginal perforations, diabetes mellitus, and smoking were significantly associated with RP. Marginal perforations (11.56 ± 5.73 months), diabetes mellitus (10.72 ± 5.09 months), and smoking (11.83 ± 4.79 months) individually led to significantly shorter RP times. The coexistence of smoking, diabetes mellitus, and marginal perforation resulted in the shortest mean RP time (6.58 ± 4.14 months). Linear regression confirmed diabetes mellitus as a significant predictor of a shorter RP time (B = -3.161, p = 0.049).

conclusionOur findings show that marginal perforations, diabetes mellitus, and smoking not only increase the risk of RP, but also significantly accelerate its timing, especially when combined. This requires closer and tailored postoperative monitoring for high-risk patients to improve the long-term success of tympanoplasty. Level of evidence: 4

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalTympanic Membrane PerforationTympanoplastyAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSmokingTime FactorsDiabetes mellitusReperforationRisk factorsSmokingTime-to-event analysisTympanoplasty

Identifiers

PMID41692869
PMCPMC13053327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.