ArticleScientific reports2026
Bi-functional Caulis polygoni multiflori inhibits Staphylococcus aureus and potentiates the activity of erythromycin in vitro.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus (SA), particularly methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), represents a major clinical challenge due to its ability to form biofilms, which contribute to treatment failure and recurrent infections. This study evaluated the antibacterial and anti-biofilm activity of the water extract of Caulis Polygoni Multiflori (CPM) against clinical and standard strains of SA. CPM exhibited consistent bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects, with time-kill assays confirming rapid elimination of planktonic bacteria at 2×MIC. Mechanistically, CPM dose-dependently inhibited bacterial adhesion to fibrin and suppressed biofilm formation, though it did not disrupt pre-formed biofilms, likely due to poor penetration into the biofilm matrix. In combination studies, CPM showed clear synergistic or additive effects with erythromycin in broth microdilution assays, but not in disk diffusion tests, possibly reflecting limited diffusion of CPM components in solid media. Importantly, CPM’s activity was independent of bacterial resistance profiles. These findings indicate that CPM acts through both direct bactericidal activity and anti-virulence mechanisms, and represents a promising candidate for topical combination therapy against MRSA skin and wound infections. Further studies are needed to elucidate its molecular mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.