ArticleScientific reports2026
Ensemble machine learning strategies for mineral prospectivity mapping under data scarcity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM), the scarcity of labeled data and severe class imbalance often undermine the stability and reliability of machine learning models. This study advances a reliability-centered framework that prioritizes calibration and reproducibility over marginal accuracy gains when training data are limited. Two ensemble configurations, Light Gradient Boosting Machine combined with AdaBoost, and Support Vector Machine combined with Gaussian Naive Bayes, were systematically evaluated using three hyperparameter optimization strategies: Grid Search, Random Search, and Bayesian Optimization. The Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) and five-fold cross-validation were applied to counteract data imbalance and improve model robustness. Results from the Dehaq Pb–Zn district, within the Sanandaj–Sirjan Zone of Iran, reveal that while Bayesian Optimization can yield slightly higher Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)-Area Under the Curve (AUC) scores, Grid Search consistently delivers more stable, well-calibrated probabilities under extreme data scarcity. The SVM + GNB ensemble tuned via Grid Search demonstrated superior balance between discrimination and reliability, achieving an AUC of 0.90 with the most consistent calibration curve, whereas the Bayesian Optimization configuration marginally reached the highest AUC (0.95). These findings highlight that stability and probability calibration are decisive for trustworthy mineral prospectivity modeling in data-scarce environments. The proposed framework provides a reproducible and interpretable pathway for translating machine learning predictions into reliable exploration decisions, supporting risk-aware targeting in early-stage mineral exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.