ArticleScientific reports2026
Biotic and abiotic drivers of biomass carbon storage in peri-urban forests in Burkina Faso.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urban and peri-urban forests are vital nature-based climate solutions in urban centers undergoing rapid urbanization and rising temperatures. While their ecological role in carbon sequestration is documented in West Africa, how environmental factors affect aboveground carbon (AGC) storage in peri-urban forests remains poorly understood. This study investigates biotic and abiotic drivers of AGC storage across three peri-urban forests in Burkina Faso. Using inventory data of 4840 individuals across 158 plots, we investigated AGC variation patterns and drivers. We applied two-way analysis of variance to examine variations in AGC across forest sites and diameter size classes, and a structural equation model (SEM) to assess the direct and indirect effects of diversity, structural, climatic and topographic variables. Results showed significant main and interactive effects of site and diameter class on AGC (p value < 0.001), indicating that carbon allocation to diameter classes varies between forests. Twenty woody species accounted for 72.5 to 92.3% of total AGC stocks across forest sites, highlighting their high carbon storage potential. SEM results showed positive direct effects of tree size variation (β = 0.41) and density (β = 0.45) on AGC, while species diversity (β = − 0.25) and elevation (β = − 0.37) reduced AGC. Precipitation seasonality had no direct effect on AGC (β = − 0.26) but positively influenced species diversity (β = 0.42). Tree density also indirectly reduced AGC (β = − 0.11) via increased diversity (β = 0.47). These findings emphasize that enhanced carbon storage in peri-urban forests can be achieved by increasing tree density and size variation. Therefore, promoting high-carbon storing trees in planting campaigns can significantly enhance climate change mitigation efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.