Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41692832›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Source camera attribution using a rule-based explainable convolutional neural network.

Tahereh Nayerifard, Haleh Amintoosi, Abbas Ghaemi Bafghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic image and video analysis, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tahereh NayerifardDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Haleh AmintoosiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran. amintoosi@um.ac.ir.
Abbas Ghaemi BafghiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a push towards adopting artificial intelligence (AI) models in digital forensics (DF), particularly deep learning (DL) models. While these models assist DF experts, their lack of transparency raises concerns about reliability. Although eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has progressed, current methods remain limited for DF applications. Existing visual XAI techniques do not provide sufficient clarity for challenging image forensics tasks such as Source Camera Identification (SCI), nor do they offer mechanisms to assess whether a model’s decision is correct. Most methods simply highlight influential regions without enabling examiners to validate the decision itself. Rule-based explainability is a promising strategy for increasing transparency, yet deploying it on real-world Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) is still challenging. Prior studies remain largely experimental and often require modifying the model to extract rules, conflicting with the integrity requirements of DF workflows. To address these gaps, this paper introduces a framework to make CNN models used in the analysis stage of digital forensics explainable. The framework, by following three fundamental steps—layers trace detection, layers majority voting, and rule extraction—provides structured and transparent visual output, and rule-based textual explainability that is understandable to the user. Based on this, the first explainable Source Camera Identification (SCI) model is introduced which is a challenging DF task to make it explainable. The explainable output allows for the rejection or confirmation of the main model’s prediction based on the decisions of the layers and compliance with the principle of integrity to the DF examiner. In addition, with the identification of 27 out of 37 incorrect predictions by the base model, the precision of the model was improved from 97.33% to 99.2%.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networkExplainable artificial intelligenceImage forensicsRule extractionSource camera attributionXAI

Identifiers

PMID41692832
PMCPMC12996404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.