SynthesisBMC public health2026
Insufficient evidence on the effectiveness of family physician program in Iran: a systematic review of existing literature.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Family Physician Program (FPP), initiated by the Iranian Ministry of Health in 2005 for rural areas and expanded to select urban regions in 2011, aimed to enhance community access to healthcare services. This systematic review aimed to examine empirical research evaluating the impact of the FPP on health indicators in both rural and urban settings in Iran.
methodsAdhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search across four international databases (ISI/Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) and three Iranian databases (Magiran, Irandoc, and Scientific Information Database). We identified peer-reviewed studies that investigated the effects of FPP on various health indicators. The risk of bias was assessed using a nine-item quality assessment tool developed by Hawker. Data were synthesized narratively through content analysis.
resultsOur search yielded 963 titles, of which 28 studies met the inclusion criteria for full-text review. The findings from these studies were contradictory regarding the FPP’s impact on access to and utilisation of healthcare services, the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases, maternal and child mortality rates, financial protection, and the satisfaction of healthcare recipients and providers.
conclusionWhile most existing studies have concentrated on access to healthcare services, the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of the FPP in Iran remains inconclusive. As a result, firm conclusions about the overall impact of the FPP cannot yet be established. Generating more robust evidence would contribute to more informed decision-making on the continuation and possible refinement of the program. Therefore, further national-level studies are recommended to provide clearer insights into the outcomes and broader implications of the FPP in Iran.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.