ArticleClinical proteomics2026
Shake and bake: a robust and cost-effective proteomic sample preparation workflow for plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.
Article in Clinical proteomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Target ALS Global Natural History Study: Cross-platform proteomics to accelerate biofluid biomarker and drug target discovery in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPlasma and cerebrospinal fluid are complementary sources of biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases. The wide dynamic range of protein abundances, particularly in plasma, hampers detection of low-abundance proteins. Depletion of high-abundance proteins and efficient enzymatic digestion can improve proteome coverage but must be carefully optimized for reproducibility, throughput, and cost-efficiency for use in large-scale clinical proteomic studies.
methodsWe developed a scalable sample preparation workflow for plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that integrates depletion of high-abundance proteins, optimized digestion using Lys-C and trypsin, and compatibility with both label-free and tandem mass tag (TMTpro)-based quantification. Depletion was performed using a multi-affinity resin with immobilized antibodies targeting 14 high-abundance plasma proteins, which collectively constitute ≈ 95% of total plasma protein content. We systematically evaluated protein depletion and enzyme digestion conditions, and the effect of deoxycholate on digestion, monitoring the number of detectable proteins and the quantitation precision.
resultsA resin-to-plasma ratio of ≥ 75 and a mixing speed of 900 rpm ensured complete and reproducible depletion. Depletion resulted in an increase in the number of identified proteins by ~ 65% in CSF, and ~ 80% in plasma, tripling the number of brain-enriched proteins, with maintained quantitative precision (median coefficient of variation (CV) for relative protein abundances < 11%). A two-step digestion protocol using Lys-C/trypsin followed by trypsin yielded the highest reproducibility and detectability in plasma. Adding the detergent deoxycholate to the samples had little effect in CSF and only marginally improved proteome coverage for plasma but decreased quantification precision and throughput. Technical replicates from a 528-sample clinical amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cohort showed high reproducibility, with intra-sample CVs substantially lower than inter-individual variation.
conclusionsThe sample preparation workflow described here enabled deep and reproducible proteome profiling of plasma and CSF in high-throughput formats and was found to be suitable for biomarker discovery in large clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.