Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41692714›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Patient-specific risk factors for repair failure and poor functional outcome after rotator cuff repair - an umbrella review.

Julia Sußiek, Stefan Buchmann, Knut Beitzel, Sebastian Lappen, Rehabilitation Committee of the German, Austrian and Swiss Shoulder and Elbow Society

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia SußiekDepartment of Trauma-, Hand- and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Waldeyerstr. 1, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
Stefan BuchmannDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Knut BeitzelDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Sebastian LappenDepartment of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. sebastian.lappen@tum.de.
Rehabilitation Committee of the German, Austrian and Swiss Shoulder and Elbow Society

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUnderstanding patient-specific factors that influence postoperative outcomes and failure rates following rotator cuff repair is crucial for surgeons to tailor individualized treatments. The purpose of this umbrella review was to identify preoperatively measurable factors that influence the risk of retear and functional outcomes following rotator cuff repair (RCR). Additionally, the study aimed to evaluate the quality of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses to provide a comprehensive understanding of these predictive factors.

methodsA systematic search of the MEDLINE database via PubMed was conducted to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting preoperatively measurable factors affecting functional outcomes and failure rates following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The methodological quality of included reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR checklist. Data synthesis summarized key risk factors, quantified study overlap via Corrected Covered Area (CCA), and examined heterogeneity and publication bias when reported in the reviews.

resultsTwenty-three systematic reviews, including 11 meta-analyses, met the inclusion criteria, yielding a CCA of 0.403, which reflects moderate overlap. The average AMSTAR score was 7.57, indicating moderate methodological quality. However, only a few reviews included analyses of heterogeneity or publication bias, and the evidence presented was often contradictory. Meta-analyses revealed statistically significant associations between higher retear rates and factors such as advanced age, reduced bone mineral density, elevated body mass index, diabetes, shorter acromiohumeral interval, increased critical shoulder angle, involvement of multiple tendons, greater tendon retraction, longer symptom duration, larger tear size, poor tissue quality, and greater distance from the musculotendinous junction to the glenoid. Genetic analyses provided moderate to strong evidence linking healing failure to mutations in the matrix metallopeptidase 3 (MMP3) and Tenascin C (TNC) genes, as well as a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the Estrogen Related Receptor β (ESRRβ) gene. Improved tendon healing was associated with the upregulation of the growth factor Bone Morphogenetic Protein 5 (BMP5) and increased expression of collagen type III (COL3). High preoperative expectations consistently correlated with better functional outcomes, whereas other psychological factors, such as concerns and fear avoidance, were associated with poorer outcomes.

conclusionEvidence synthesized in this review underscores the importance of patient age, expectations, and the extent of the rotator cuff tear in influencing outcomes following rotator cuff repair. These factors should be carefully considered in treatment planning for patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyRotator CuffRotator Cuff InjuriesHumansRecovery of FunctionRisk FactorsTreatment FailureTreatment OutcomeCuff integrityPrognostic factorsRehabilitationRisk factorsRotator cuff tearSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41692714
PMCPMC12930581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.