ArticleBMJ open2026
Association of caregiver's burden and mental health status in caregivers of patients with cancer from central rural India: a mixed-method study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCancer remains a growing public health challenge in India, impacting not only patients but also their caregivers, often family members who bear the emotional, physical and financial burdens of care. These family caregivers face overwhelming stress, anxiety and depression, particularly in rural areas with limited healthcare access. Cultural expectations often lead them to neglect their own well-being. Many are forced to reduce work or quit jobs, worsening financial strain. Despite their vital role, caregivers are largely overlooked in cancer care discourse. There is an urgent need for India-specific, empathetic research and policies that support caregiver health and recognise caregiving as a public health priority. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study employs a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design to examine the association between caregiver burden and mental health status among informal caregivers of patients with cancer in central rural India. In the quantitative phase, a cross-sectional survey will be conducted using systematic random sampling. Data will be collected via a semistructured questionnaire and standardised tools: the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory to assess burnout levels, and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 to evaluate psychological distress. Statistical analysis will include descriptive statistics and regression analysis.The qualitative phase will involve in-depth interviews with purposively selected caregivers to explore lived experiences, coping mechanisms and emotional challenges. Interviews will be transcribed and analysed using thematic content analysis. Integration of quantitative and qualitative findings will provide a comprehensive understanding of caregiver burden and mental health, reflecting both measurable patterns and the human experience of caregiving in a rural setting. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical clearance for this study protocol was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha (Approval No. DMIHER(DU)/IEC/2025/436). Permission for data collection was further granted by both the institutional ethics committee and Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha. The findings of this research will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals and by engaging relevant stakeholders through appropriate channels of communication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2025/08/093357.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.