ArticleThe Angle orthodontist2026
Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic-surgical treatment for impacted canines.
Article in The Angle orthodontist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To determine failure rates of orthodontic-surgical treatment for maxillary and mandibular impacted canines and identify patient- and treatment-related risk factors of failure, increased duration, and need for surgical reintervention. Materials and Methods: Panoramic radiographs and clinical records of patients who consecutively visited the Postgraduate Clinic of the Department of Orthodontics of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, were retrospectively retrieved and analyzed. Two statistical analyses were conducted, using canine and patient as units of analysis, respectively, to account for bilaterally impacted canines, resulting in multiple observations per individual. Linear and logistic regression models were employed. Results: A total of 84 patients with 106 impacted canines were included. An overall failure rate of 11.3% was reported. With canine as the analysis unit, age was the only significant risk factor for failure, while both age and exposure technique were linked to the need for reintervention. In the mixed-effects regression model, age remained the only significant risk factor for both failure and reintervention. Regarding increased duration, an association was detected with increased angulation, proximity to midline, and closed exposure. Conclusions: Increased age is a significant risk factor for treatment failure and surgical reintervention of impacted canines, while greater angulation, proximity to midline, and closed over open exposure may be associated with prolonged treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.