ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2026
Conduit Choice and Volume-Outcome Relationships in Multiarterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting of Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States.
Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMultiarterial grafting is underused. We evaluated the association between surgeon experience and conduit use outcomes after multiarterial grafting.
methodsUsing US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid data, we identified 29,268 patients ≥65 years undergoing isolated, primary, nonemergency multiarterial grafting, of whom 15,682 met the inclusion criteria. Propensity score matching was performed on 26 baseline patient characteristics. Individual surgeons were grouped into tertiles on the basis of conduit use: low volume, <3 radial arteries or 2 bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafts annually; high volume, >10 radial arteries or 4 BITA grafts annually. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE): death, myocardial infarction, or repeated revascularization at 4 years. Outcomes were compared in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for the individual surgeon's case volume of each conduit.
resultsAmong recipients of multiarterial grafting, 5784 (20%) received radial artery grafts and 9898 (34%) received BITA grafts. Radial artery recipients were younger (70.6 vs 71.2 years) and more likely to be diabetic (46.9% vs 43.2%) than BITA recipients. Of 5778 matched pairs, at 4 years, the incidence of MACE was numerically lower in the radial artery group (14.7% vs 15.7%; P = .05), but there was no difference in all-cause mortality (10.8% radial artery vs 11.5% BITA; P = .06). For BITA graft recipients, surgeon experience was associated with MACE only in the lowest vs the highest volume tertile (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33; P = .046). There was no association between MACE and surgeon volume for radial artery graft recipients.
conclusionsRadial artery and BITA grafting demonstrated similar midterm outcomes, whereas there was a surgeon-volume effect for BITA use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.