SynthesisEuropean journal of haematology2026
Increasing Trends of Minimal Residual Disease Measurement in Trials Focusing on Multiple Myeloma Treatment: A Systematic Analysis of Clinical Research Design From 2014 to 2025.
Synthesis in European journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) is a central biomarker in multiple myeloma (MM), offering unprecedented sensitivity for evaluating treatment efficacy and serving as a potential surrogate endpoint. We conducted a comprehensive analysis of clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between 2014 and 2025. Interventional trials or observational studies investigating therapeutic interventions were included. Data on therapy response, MRD outcomes, measurement, and their role as primary, secondary, or adaptive endpoints were extracted. A total of 1336 studies met inclusion criteria. Among interventional trials, 86.4% included therapy response and 30.9% MRD as an outcome. Trials assessing MRD increased steadily from 6.7% in 2014 to 56.8% in 2025. Almost 50% of trials with recruiting (46.0%) or not yet recruiting (46.8%) status had an MRD outcome. MRD served as a primary outcome in 28.4% of trials with MRD assessment and guided therapeutic decisions in 7.5%. Most studies used next-generation flow or sequencing at a 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.