ArticleBone & joint research2026
Quantitative evaluation of cervical muscles in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy using diffusion tensor imaging metrics.
Article in Bone & joint research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The objective of this research was to assess the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters of deep cervical muscles in patients diagnosed with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) before and after surgery at different follow-up stages, and to analyze their relationship with functional scores. Methods: This study involved 30 patients with DCM who underwent cervical laminoplasty. DTI imaging and clinical assessments were performed preoperatively as well as at three-month and six-month follow-up. DTI parameters (fractional anisotropy (FA); mean diffusivity (MD); radial diffusivity (RD); and axial diffusivity (AD)) of cervical paraspinal muscles (multifidus and semispinalis cervicis) were measured, and mean values were calculated. Preoperative and postoperative changes in DTI parameters were analyzed using the Friedman test. Spearman correlation and linear regression analyses was conducted to assess the relationship between preoperative cervical paraspinal muscle DTI measurements and changes in modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scores and visual analogue scale (VAS) at preoperative and three-month and six-month follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between recovery rates of mJOA and VAS and changes of DTI metrics. Results: Preoperative paraspinal muscle FA is associated with preoperative mJOA scores ( Conclusion: In DCM patients, changes in DTI parameters from preoperative to postoperative follow-up stages can indicate paraspinal muscle recovery after cervical surgery. DTI examination before surgery can predict patient recovery outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.