ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
Personalized sepsis mortality prediction: An interpretable machine learning nomogram.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSepsis remains a major cause of mortality in ICU patients, requiring accurate prognostic tools for optimal management. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning-based nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality in sepsis patients to guide clinical decision-making.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 407 adult sepsis patients from ICU admissions between January 2019 and December 2024. Patients were randomly divided into training (n = 284) and validation (n = 123) cohorts. A LASSO-based multivariate logistic regression was applied to construct a predictive nomogram.
resultsSeven independent predictors emerged for in-hospital mortality: age, abdominal infection, vasopressor requirement, WBC, BNP, APACHE II score, and mechanical ventilation support. The nomogram showed strong discrimination with an AUC of 0.900 in the training cohort and 0.796 in the validation cohort. Calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and SHAP interpretation confirmed good model performance and clinical utility.
conclusionsThe novel machine learning-based nomogram provides a practical, interpretable risk assessment tool for early mortality prediction, potentially improving patient outcomes through enhanced clinical understanding and timely interventions in critically ill sepsis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.