ArticlePoultry science2026
Accuracy of single-step genomic selection for egg production in yellow-feathered broilers using a random regression model.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Egg production is a crucial economic trait in poultry. Conventional cumulative yield analyses (e.g., single-trait models, STM) overlook dynamic environmental and physiological influences, while multi-trait models (MTM) partition production into discrete stages but fail to capture continuous temporal patterns. Random regression models (RRM) enable longitudinal data analysis to dissect time-dependent genetic effects, offering flexibility in predicting breeding values at any production stage. This study compared the accuracy of single-step genomic selection (ssGBLUP) combined with RRM for egg production in yellow-feathered broilers. It utilized RRM, MTM, and STM based on 168,596 records from 18,221 chickens. Of these, 17,619 animals had genotypic data, and pedigree information was available for 78,449 animals. RRM analyzed biweekly production (12 time points from 20 to 43 weeks) via Legendre polynomials; MTM evaluated three laying phases (20-26, 27-34, 35-43 weeks); STM used cumulative yield (20-43 weeks). The optimal RRM orders were fixed regression (2nd), additive genetic effects (1st), and permanent environmental effects (4th). RRM-derived heritability (0.01-0.19) showed an increase-decrease-increase trend, contrasting with MTM phase heritabilities (0.128, 0.267, 0.300) and STM heritability (0.329). The integration of single-step genomic selection with RRM significantly outperformed MTM and STM in terms of accuracy and unbiasedness of estimated breeding values (EBV). Specifically, RRM improved accuracy by 3 % (pedigree) and 2.9 % (genomic) over MTM, and 7 % (pedigree) and 6.8 % (genomic) over STM; unbiasedness increased by 26 % (pedigree) and 25.6 % (genomic) over MTM, and 14.5 % (pedigree) and 12 % (genomic) over STM. Notably, combining RRM with single-step genomic methods enhanced EBV accuracy by up to 84 % and unbiasedness by 26 % compared to pedigree-based models. This study validates that the integration of RRM with ssGBLUP presents a promising avenue for enhancing genomic selection programs aimed at improving longitudinal production traits like egg number in poultry breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.