ArticleCurrent medical imaging2026
BSc-DARTS: Neural Architecture Search for Automatic Diagnosis of Bone Metastases in Bone Scintigrams
Article in Current medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBone scintigram is a highly effective medical imaging technique widely used for the rapid screening of bone metastases, contributing significantly to early disease detection and prognosis assessment. Neural architecture search enables automated design and optimization of network structures by leveraging data characteristics and task-specific requirements.
objectiveFor the automated and accurate diagnosis of bone metastasis in bone scintigrams, this study proposes an improved differentiable neural architecture search framework to address two key limitations of the original DARTS method: (1) the insufficient representation capability of standard candidate operations for characterizing bone metastasis lesions, and (2) architecture degeneration.
methodsBased on the DARTS framework, two novel candidate operations were developed, and the training supernet architecture was optimized. (1) The channel-attention-integrated residual operation incorporates synergistic channel-wise intelligent weighting and gradient stabilization mechanisms, providing an efficient yet highly discriminative feature transformation module for architecture search. (2) The spatial-attention-enhanced multibranch operation combines multi-scale feature fusion with spatially adaptive focusing, significantly improving the model’s ability to localize critical regions and detect lesions of varying sizes. (3) A dual-path convolutional structure is introduced into the training supernet to dynamically optimize both channel-wise and spatial dimensions of shallow features, thereby generating highly discriminative representations for subsequent cell architecture search.
resultsComprehensive evaluations on clinical datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method, achieving an accuracy of 0.8451, precision of 0.8700, recall of 0.8447, F1-score of 0.8423, and an AUC of 0.92. Discussion: The results validate that incorporating manual network design experience into the architecture search process can significantly improve model performance. Systematically leveraging anterior-posterior views of the same case can improve lesion detection in complex anatomical regions. Future work will focus on developing a dual-view architecture search framework based on complementary feature fusion.
conclusionThe proposed neural architecture search method effectively detects bone metastasis in bone scintigrams and outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches. The newly developed candidate operations and supernet optimizations successfully address the limited representational capacity of standard convolutions in the original DARTS operations, leading to substantial improvements in classification performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.