Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41691588›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology2026

HPV Type Replacement After HPV Vaccination.

Elizabeth M Anderson, Alfred J Saah, Joseph E Tota

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in microbiology and immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth M AndersonMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Alfred J SaahMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Joseph E TotaMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. joseph.tota@merck.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination effectively reduces the risk of HPV-attributable cancers, including cervical, vulvar, vaginal, anal, oropharyngeal, and other head and neck cancers. Concerns for a lower-than-expected vaccine impact, as defined as an increase in the prevalence of precancer by nonvaccine types, compared to that anticipated based on attribution studies, have been raised in the postvaccination era. Three distinct and nonmutually exclusive processes-HPV type replacement, clinical unmasking, and viral unmasking-could be responsible for this apparent increase of nonvaccine types. HPV type replacement, in which nonvaccine types fill a niche left vacant after the elimination of vaccine types, is unlikely to occur due to the remarkable genetic stability of the virus and the lack of natural competition between individual HPV types. However, clinical unmasking, in which the absence of clinical interventions aimed at eliminating cervical disease caused by vaccine types permits uninterrupted progression of nonvaccine types, may occur since HPV coinfections are common. Alternatively, the observed shift could be completely erroneous due to the false discovery of type replacement via viral unmasking, a diagnostic assay artifact. In this chapter, we describe these processes and the mechanisms underlying them.

Indexed as

Human Papillomavirus VirusesPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansVaccinationPapillomavirus VaccinesClinical unmaskingHPV vaccineHuman papillomavirusType replacementVaccine effectivenessViral unmasking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.