ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Understanding nonlinearity in weighted least-squares image reconstruction for nuclear medicine.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated a linear approximation of weighted least squares (WLS) and its regularized variants using reductio ad absurdum and numerical simulations. Three phantoms were employed in the simulation: point source 1 represented by a two-dimensional (2D) Gaussian with a full width at half maximum of 3 pixels positioned at the center of the background; point source 2, a 2D Gaussian positioned 24 pixels away from point source 1 along the x-axis; and point source 3 is the sum of them. Ideal 2D parallel-beam projections were used. When the absolute difference of area under curve or the absolute difference of recovery between the reconstructed images of point source 3 and sum of point source 1 and 2, falls within a predetermined threshold, it was defined as linear approximation. The variance of WLS was estimated using either the projections of original image or forward projections. Filtered backprojection and least squares were used as a reference of linear reconstruction. We proved that WLS is nonlinear for small number of iterations but is approximated as linear for large number of iterations by reductio ad absurdum. WLS regularized with a quadratic function (WLS-QU) and a relative difference function (WLS-RD) were both proved to be nonlinear. Simulation results showed that WLS was nonlinear, but it becomes linear approximation when the number of iterations approached 50 with 64 subsets. WLS-QU and WLS-RD was nonlinear. When the likelihood term itself is nonlinear, the reconstruction becomes nonlinear irrespective of the form of the regularization function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41691574What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.