Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41691545›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2026

How Does Biological Sex Impact Mucosal Bacterial Infection? Mucosal Defenses and Bacterial Detection.

Laura Ramirez Finn, Molly A Ingersoll

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Laura Ramirez FinnMucosal Inflammation and Immunity Team, Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Cochin, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2649-9167
Molly A IngersollMucosal Inflammation and Immunity Team, Université Paris Cité, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Cochin, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6388-7003

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-19-CE15-0015Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-21-CE15-0006Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-22-CE15-0022Pasteur-Paris University (PPU) International PhD program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infections possess substantial sex disparities in the incidence, immune response, and progression of infection. Some of these distinctions may be due to sexual dimorphism in mucosal barriers or sex differences in the initial immune response to infection. Mucosal organs are protected by a mucus barrier, however, there is little knowledge of the impact of biological sex on this layer in homeostasis and infection. Notably, despite the incidence of infection, there is a paucity of even fundamental research on bladder mucus in homeostasis and infectious disease. When bacteria encounter mucosal epithelia, they must bind and potentially invade these surfaces to initiate an infection. Whether differences in mucosal epithelia have an impact on bacterial-epithelial interactions between the sexes is not known. When bacteria are sensed by the host, they initiate transcription factor activation, which may differ by sex of the host. Finally, sex steroid hormone receptor signaling likely also impacts innate immunity between the sexes, leading to the divergence between the sexes observed in mucosa infection.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacterial InfectionsImmunity, MucosalMucous MembraneAnimalsFemaleGonadal Steroid HormonesHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmunity, InnateInnate Immunity RecognitionMaleSex CharacteristicsSex FactorsSignal TransductionGonadal Steroid Hormonesbacterial infectionsearly immune detectionepithelial invasionmucussex differences

Identifiers

PMID41691545
PMCPMC12906789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.